NC3 Decision Making: Individual Versus Group Process

Dr. Alex Wallerstein sketches a framework for thinking about how concentrated nuclear use authority should be at the top. While he discusses specific U.S. proposals for reform in response to recent domestic debates, the scope of his analysis is uniquely global and includes a comparative analysis of the approach of all nine nuclear weapons states.

In this essay, Dr. Alex Wellerstein sketches a framework for thinking about how concentrated nuclear use authority should be at the top. While he discusses specific U.S. proposals for reform in response to recent domestic debates, the scope of his analysis is uniquely global and includes a comparative analysis of the approach of all nine nuclear weapons states.

Global NC3 systems are historically constituted and contextualized, the result of considerable debate and experimentation over time within nuclear states. This fact points to their necessary adaptability, and to the opportunity for novel approaches going forward. Using a global perspective, the framework presented by Dr. Wellerstein within this essay could provide inspiration for an alternative, perhaps less risky nuclear command and control arrangements.

About the author: Dr. Alex Wellerstein is a historian of science and nuclear weapons at the Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, New Jersey. Dr. Wellerstein holds a Ph.D. in the History of Science from Harvard University, and obtained a B.A. in History from the University of California, Berkeley.

This is paper is accompanied by a Fourth Leg podcast: Questioning Unitary Command: Nuclear Launch Authority and the N-Person Problem

 

Related Content

MENU

GET IN TOUCH

Email: [email protected]
Send us a message: Contact

JOIN THE CATALINK MAILING LIST